|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 22, 2007 18:27:21 GMT -5
^^ so just because they are better known sites that makes there opinion mean more???i dont think so...look at imdb the comment part for this episode its about 50/50...plus im old enough to not care what some moron from a horror site thinks..
as for what i liked..yea i liked the gore it had a few great scenes..it was very entertaining..but what was maybe the best was the end..where it showed even a big ugly demon beast can care and have feelings..there deff was a message hidden away in there..im not saying you have to like it..but im not gonna go by what some idiot on a horror site says..i watched it and i loved it..like i said its prob my fav episode..right up there with family and deer women.
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 19:49:40 GMT -5
i'm not saying you have to like it.. I understand. im not gonna go by what some idiot on a horror site says.. Some idiot? Wake up - the majority of the site, the 4 sites I mentioned, agree Pro-Life is a terrible episode. I still haven't seen it yet myself, but I'm gonna do the smart thing and skip it. what was maybe the best was the end..where it showed even a big ugly demon beast can care and have feelings..there deff was a message hidden away in there.. Well, this is the first I've heard about any kind of message whatsoever. Enough people have watched it to where they would have picked up on this message, and nobody mentioned it. Believe me- these are the people who know the messages of George A. Romero's films, and I never understood those myself. If they can, they can understand anything and see the quality in a good project. If they give Pro-Life a thumbs down, they obviously know what they're talking about. Though... and I'll give you this one... they also seemed to agree in majority (all 4, plus more sites) that High (Haute) Tension was a great movie. And that movie sucked complete monkeyballs. Besides, this sort of thing has obviously been done before - It's Alive, Rosemary's Baby, God Told Me To, The Unborn, and John Carpenter's The Thing. There's no way the director found any way to improve upon that formula. it had a few great scenes..it was very entertaining.. Very entertaining? To you? Well, more people said it wasn't entertaining than those who agree with you. Sorry. ^^ so just because they are better known sites that makes there opinion mean more??? i dont think so... look at imdb the comment part for this episode its about 50/50... plus im old enough to not care what some moron from a horror site thinks.. Look, there comes a time in everyone's life where they just have to admit that some people would know better. Get used to it if you haven't yet. Life is gonna be real tough. Besides, um... what makes the IMDb 50/50 any better than a Site of Seasoned-Horror Fans who actually know what they're talking about???
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 22, 2007 19:59:43 GMT -5
^^ haha so you havent even seen it??? yet your gonna listen to some morons on a website and take there judgement..and no they dont know more then me because i have prob seen twice the amount of movies they have..i dont care what anyone else thinks..you should start forming your own judgement and see it for yourself..its entertaining...has some great gore and a strong message..a perfect episode...those same morons you talk about gave black cat such high prasie and i didnt care much for it at all..but you cant even really talk about pro-life since you have never seen it..if you want an entertaining movie with good gore and a strong message..then watch it..if you wanna let other people judge a movie for you then i feel bad for you
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 20:21:24 GMT -5
you cant even really talk about pro-life since you have never seen it.. I'm not. I'm talking about what other people think about it. i dont care what anyone else thinks..your gonna listen to some morons on a website and take there judgement..and no they dont know more then me because i have prob seen twice the amount of movies they have.. No, you haven't. They've seen more than you. And they are not morons. Well, not usually. They were if/when they said High Tension was good. Did you think High Tension was bad? If you did... maybe you know a little better than those people who said High Tension was good but Pro-Life was bad. you should start forming your own judgement and see it for yourself.. Actually, I'm going to do the smart thing and skip it. You really have to do your homework. Read up about it online- 80% of all people who reviewed it online, anywhere, all sites combined, thought it stunk. Some said it was the absolute worst of the 2nd season. I'm not going to take your word over 80%. its entertaining...has a strong message..a perfect episode... 80% of all people who saw it online disagree with you. Stop pretending they're morons. those same morons you talk about gave black cat such high praise and i didnt care much for it at all.. You don't have the best taste in horror. You don't even think The Texas Chainsaw Massacre '74 is very good. But it's a masterpiece. And since you don't think so, you need more time and viewings to get to know horror better. ..if you wanna let other people judge a movie for you then i feel bad for you Hey wake up, kid, this movie has been done before. It's called: Rosemary's Baby. And It's Alive. And God Told Me To. And The Unborn. And John Carpenter's The Thing. See those movies, they're all better. I know because they came first and were better received by the critics.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 22, 2007 20:29:23 GMT -5
there is so much wrong with that i have to keep it short..just because they review movies for a site doesnt mean they have seen more then me..i would bet my life i have seen more then them..you dont know how many movies i watch..also this hasnt been done before..you havent seen it so you dont know..and stop pulling that 80% outta ur ass...its about 50/50...look at imdb those are actual movie fans..not some moron critic..and you say i dont have the best taste yet yo like squirm..everyone has there own taste there is no bad or good..i dont even look at reviews because i could care less what some fat slob sitting behind a computer thinks..pro-life has a good message and was a great episode..but since your gonna listen to a few moronic critics who prob arent even horror fans then i guess youll never get to find that out
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 20:49:11 GMT -5
you dont know how many movies i watch..also this hasn't been done before..just because they review movies for a site doesnt mean they have seen more then me..i would bet my life i have seen more then them.. That's what every little kid who doesn't know horror very well thinks. What makes you any different? ..you havent seen it so you dont know..and stop pulling that 80% outta ur ass...its about 50/50...look at imdb those are actual movie fans..not some moron critic.. Um, what makes you think all the horror boards on the internet except yours are all "JUST" critics and not fans. You're the moron because you think the IMDb people would know better than everyone else. Besides- how do you know those people on the IMDb who voted ACTUALLY SAW THE MOVIE? A member of the IMDb can vote without actually seeing the movie. I know- I'm a member of the site. I know how the place works. However, the opinions, printed / typed out of 80% of the people who've seen this, they don't lie. and you say i dont have the best taste Which is true, because you don't get The Texas Chainsaw Massacre '74, only one of the most acclaimed horror movies ever made, and is on the top 10 lists of about 92% of EVERY HORROR FAN who's ever made one! What's your excuse now? Yeah, I did. Because it was a good movie. So you don't think so. So what? What makes you think you know better than me? You didn't get The Texas Chainsaw Massacre '74... You're not the expert you think you are. ..i dont even look at reviews because i could care less what some fat slob sitting behind a computer thinks.. Um... what makes you think the people voting at the IMDb aren't "fat slob"s "sitting behind a computer" ?? How do you know all people at all the horror movie websites online are "fat slob"s "sitting behind a computer" ?? pro-life has a good message and was a great episode..but since your gonna listen to a few moronic critics who prob arent even horror fans then i guess youll never get to find that out Why would I want to watch something that's been done at least 4 times before? There's no way this could ever be better than Rosemary's Baby, It's Alive, God Told Me To, or The Unborn. At all, ever, never, uh-uh, nada, nil, zilch, zero! Besides- to see it, I would have to shell out $12 for the DVD. My The Screwfly Solution DVD wasn't even worth the $8.36 (I'm not sure about the cents) I paid for it at WalMart, and I'm a huge fan of Joe Dante's horror movies and I want to keep it just for the audio commentary (because it's Joe Dante!). Why the hell would I buy a clearly inferior movie by an overrated director for 3 dollars more?
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 22, 2007 21:02:51 GMT -5
haha ok your right and im wrong...nothing i say is gonna get through that thick skull of yours
you dont know how many movies i watch..also this hasn't been done before..just because they review movies for a site doesnt mean they have seen more then me..i would bet my life i have seen more then them..
That's what every little kid who doesn't know horror very well thinks. What makes you any different?
but i will comment on that..im not a little kid im 23 and have been watching horror my whole life...i dont just watch it i live it...i dont review movies for money or my job i watch them because i lve them..i have gone through stretches in my life where i spent entire paychecks on movies..where i sat and watched 3 movies a night..yea i go through stretches where im obbsessed...im not saying i know more then a critic but i sure as hell know i watched more movies then most of them..and like horror more then most of them
plus pro-life is nothing at all like rosemarys baby..not even close...its more like assault on precinct 13..but with a great message at the end..but againt you are "always right"...so there is no reasoning with you
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 21:10:57 GMT -5
there is no reasoning with you..haha ok your right and im wrong...nothing i say is gonna get through that thick skull of yours I don't even think you know what you're saying. ..im not a little kid im 23 and have been watching horror my whole life...i dont just watch it i live it...i dont review movies for money or my job i watch them because i love them..i have gone through stretches in my life where i spent entire paychecks on movies..where i sat and watched 3 movies a night..yea i go through stretches where im obbsessed...im not saying i know more then a critic but i sure as hell know i watched more movies then most of them..and like horror more then most of them Actually, I only called you a kid because you seem to keep prefering gore to anything else. Which explains why you didn't get Texas Chainsaw Massacre '74 or Sick Girl - they weren't gory. plus pro-life is nothing at all like rosemarys baby..not even close...its more like assault on precinct 13.. Oh, GOD! Assault on Precinct 13 isn't even a horror movie! And by the way, the reviewers noted that it was like Assault on Precinct 13. Not a big coo, you know- it's an action movie. Horror movies should kind of be like... horror movies.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 22, 2007 21:18:11 GMT -5
i like gore sure..but i dont need it..i have seen great horror movies without gore..and when i say its like assault on precinct 13 i mean its about people locked in a building and guys trying to break in..yea it had some action..but it really wasnt like any of the movies you mentioned..sure it deals with a demon baby..but other then that it was completely diff..what it showed was man is the real crazy one..the demon did what he had to to get some1 pregnant..and it showed at the end all he wanted was his baby and not to really hurt any1 unless they were a threat..it had alot more meaning then you make it seem..maybe the idiots reviews who you read didnt get that out of it but i sure did..but i loved it and you havent seen it so just leave it at that..if you ever do cave in and see id like to know what you feel about it..
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 21:37:06 GMT -5
..maybe the idiots reviews who you read didnt get that out of it but i sure did..but i loved it and you havent seen it so just leave it at that..if you ever do cave in and see id like to know what you feel about it.. I'm not ever going to watch it. It's not worth it. Besides, I saw the trailer. 4 or 5 times. Even that sucked. None of the plot or story looks any good, and there's way too much gore and special effects.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 22, 2007 21:41:39 GMT -5
well then your missing a great episode with a great meaning to it
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 22:09:20 GMT -5
Who cares what the monster feels? Isn't the person more important? Especially since some dickhead monster whatever impregnated her!
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 22, 2007 22:52:32 GMT -5
nope..man is actually the d*ckhead or monster..the demon did what it had to..he didnt harm her he inpregnated her to have a kid..not to many people are willing to f*ck a demon ya know..the demon can kind of be compared to an animal...do what ya gotta do to survive..
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 23, 2007 3:23:52 GMT -5
Okay, let me get this straight, Laz. You're getting this worked up defending a view of a movie YOU HAVEN'T SEEN? Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it you who has been slamming tsmooth and I for thinking OJ is guilty, when we weren't there to witness it? How can you say all that and now come back and vehemently pass judgement on a movie that you haven't seen? Lol, I always knew you were a true hypocrite with an axe to grind.............Now you've proved it here for everybody to see! What a proud moment this must be for you.............
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 23, 2007 6:47:30 GMT -5
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it you who has been slamming tsmooth and I for thinking wife killer is guilty I'm not correcting you, because I don't feel better about myself for anything I've said here (I'm not about ego, seriously, if I was, I would be "too big" for the internet itself). But that is incorrect, a simple error in judgment. I never slammed you for THINKING it. Just for saying it over and over again without proper proof, just reasonable doubt. I probably think it too, I never took time to really go into that. Certainly one of the reasons why is because neither one of you are experts in this, so you can't do any better proving it than the actual forensic people. How can you say all that and now come back and vehemently pass judgment on a movie that you haven't seen? I know the people who reviewed it. Yes, they hit their heads on a giant rock when they gave High Tension a passing grade... but I tend to believe it when 80% of the people on almost every horror source on the internet say it sucks. Plus, how good could it be? You have to go back and look at a little something called Precident. All I said here was "how good could it possibly be if it's been done at least 4 times before"? Remember that. That's what I said. You can't turn that into something I didn't say when that's all I said. I always knew you were a true hypocrite I'm not a hypocrite, a "true" hypocrite, or any other kind of hypocrite.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 23, 2007 6:53:57 GMT -5
you are a hypocrite tho..instead of watching movies you let other people make a judgement for you..and i have seen many good reviews for it..maybe 80% of the sites you checked out didnt like it..but thats not saying much..you act as if these sites are alive and are the god of knowledge..there fat ugly losers reviewing movies..and i have said its not like the movies you mentioned..this movie is about the love a parent has for its child
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 23, 2007 7:02:58 GMT -5
Laz, the point I'm trying to make is that if you're gonna jump all over people saying "you have to be there to know for sure" then you can't try to justify trashing a movie that you admittedly haven't seen. What's good for the goose is good for the gander my friend.
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 23, 2007 7:21:57 GMT -5
..this movie is about the love a parent has for its child Which is just like - Rosemary's Baby and It's Alive. Right? How is it different? Just with different actors and gore? And Dave, I'm not trying to ignore you... I just have nothing to say in response to that post.
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Oct 25, 2007 19:29:24 GMT -5
Huge fan of masters of horror but i am also conflicted.I own all of season one and think that they are highly superior to season two.But season two is a lot more gory(from what i've seen) and seems to have a lot more stinkers(We all scream,Valerie,and the V word).Imprint is my fave( very deranged but at the same time has a sense of beauty to it).where's my insense...
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Oct 28, 2007 9:57:30 GMT -5
Malbowski13, you are clearly a very intelligent person.
|
|