|
Post by lazario on Sept 29, 2007 8:45:27 GMT -5
^^ and do you realize i dont give a shit about reviews???..just stop talking to me about reviews because i only care about my view of the movie..not some asshole i dont know.. It doesn't matter what you give, you can't take others insight and intelligence away from them with petty, lame insults. And they've shown more than you have. i have seen most of both seasons and season 2 was much better.. That's what you think, the VAST majority disagrees with you. If you don't like that, tough shit. about imdb like i said in the other topic..i dont mean the actua number score..which yes is very flawed...i mean the people that actually take time to write the reviews..go look there..theres plent of very good reviews for pro-life and every other episode.. Oh, you mean those "assholes" and "morons"?? You can't say critics who actually know horror are assholes and morons, but IMDb just because you say they agree with you are better. get over yourself..season 2 is better then 1..you are wrong..so you lose.. YOU WISHits pathetic how you pick and choose reviews to make your point.. No, it's pathetic how you prefer IMDb, a bunch of idiotic POSERS who don't know their ass from a hole in the ground over the majority of Horror Dedicated Internet Sites (meaning, they know more about it, have seen more, and are far more trustworthy). Most of those people on the IMDb rating this show are the idiots who only go to the theaters to see Remakes and Prequels or buy direct to DVD copies of I'll Always Know What You Did Last Summer and Urban Legends: Bloody Mary! So what if you think they're more like you, YOU CAN'T PROVE THAT. You can't do as much research on them as you can do at the real horror websites. ..you will take all your bad reviews and have an excuse for my good ones.. Well, you got your good reviews from the IMDb. That's not where most real horror fans go. ..every masters of horror episode got 50/50 reviews At the IMDb, the home of POSERS. Which means, they're not right or even close! You are living in a DREAM WORLD. And you're gonna have to deal with that. i saw most of them and made a judgement based on my opinion.. And your "opinion" isn't worth SHIT. Because you think Pro-Life and House of 1,000 Corpses are good and Sq uirm and Texas Chainsaw Massacre '74 are not.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 29, 2007 8:56:41 GMT -5
i dont listen to the people at imdb either...im just making a point that you cant pick and choose reviews..i dont listen to any reviews..never have in my life..you claim to know so much about horror yet you cant even make your own decision..you let assholes you dont know do that for you..did you even see TCM or did you just read it was a masterpiece so then you called it that?? but like i have already said you are wrong.. a real horror fan judges a movie for himself...the guys you worship are are as much the poser as a random imdb user..now drop it..you have been exposed as a fraud who instead of watching movies bases his judgement on what some idiot stranger has to say..but im off to bed now..
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 29, 2007 9:31:08 GMT -5
...im just making a point that you cant pick and choose reviews.. That's your point. My point is: the IMDb and Horror Dedicated Internet Sites are different. The IMDb are not better or smarter. So, yes, if you know the people at the Horror Sites, you know they know better and care more. ..you claim to know so much about horror yet you cant even make your own decision.. Yes I have made my own decision- the research I did merely proved that my decision was a smart and good one. you let assholes you dont know do that for you.. I know them better than you know people at IMDb. I did research on their opinions, they're smarter than the IMDb posers. did you even see TCM or did you just read it was a masterpiece so then you called it that?? Oh that was clever. Did your Mommy help you out with that one? Of course I've seen it, you moron. I can also break it down SCENE BY SCENE. Can you? but like i have already said you are wrong.. You Wish. a real horror fan judges a movie for himself.. Not every movie needs to be judged the same way. Besides, this is Masters of Horror. All 12 of the North American episodes are shot with the same crew, on almost the exact same budget, and all over the same time schedule. You are letting your silly idealism speak for something you need logic to understand. And this is just about Pro-Life, you knob! This isn't about every horror movie ever made. You don't actually think at all, about anything, do you? I've made myself perfectly clear. You want to prove me wrong by saying this is the way I decide everything? You can't do that, it's not true. And I told you that from the very beginning. You may think you can confuse me out of using logic, they way you never use logic, but I actually know what I'm doing. I never said I worship them. You made that up because you think it makes you look smarter than me somehow. Looking up information doesn't mean I worship the person I'm researching, it just means that I want to know what I'm talking about. ..now drop it..you have been exposed as a fraud YOU WISH!!!
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 29, 2007 17:47:20 GMT -5
ok well again im gonna stop because obviously you are just gonna keep trying to bullshit your way outta this..you say i need to use logic yet you dont use logic in the of case..yea thats smart..i dont try to turn this into some competition like you about who knows more about horror..and you say guys at horror sites are smarter then imdb posters??? that is complete bullshit..abslolutly complete bullshit..because you dont know any of them...some may be some might not be..dont act as if you know..but like i was saying since you wanna make it into a competition i will sy at least i make my own judgments snd dont have some1 else do it for me..but like i said drop it..stop digging yourself into a deeper whole and trying to bullshit your way out...you cant always be right and you are not right
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 29, 2007 18:51:06 GMT -5
ok well again im gonna stop because obviously you are just gonna keep trying to bullshit your way outta this.. YOU'RE THE ONE TRYING TO BULLSHIT YOUR WAY OUT OF THIS!!!I've proved I know what I'm talking about. But you can't! you say guys at horror sites are smarter then imdb posters??? that is complete bullshit..abslolutly complete bullshit.. YOU WISH!I didn't make this into a competition. YOU did by challenging me on my very clear logic, insinuating that I confused you, and by putting words in my mouth. YOU'RE the one trying to bullshit out of this discussion and you keep doing it by ignoring everything I say. The IMDb attracts nothing BUT posers (not "posters")! You obviously fell off the wagon yesterday. drop it..stop digging yourself into a deeper whole and trying to bullshit your way out..you are not right I'll drop it as soon as you quit being a retarded dipshit moron! I made myself PERFECTLY CLEAR before and you twisted everything I said. Read my last posts instead of hoping to find something to twist around. YOU'RE the one who's digging a hole.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 29, 2007 21:10:17 GMT -5
everything you just said you described yourself...your the one who twists everything around...your the one who bullshits his way through everything..the guys you worship are wannabe posers..you have no logic in anything you say and make up stuff just to be right..me and im pretty sure everyone else on this board can see how you twist everything around so you are "right" when really you have no idea what your talking about..
its very simple..according to you i dont know of did it because i wasnt in his room...yet you dont have to watch a movie to know it bad..your logic is on the evel of a 2 year old..a 2 year old who always has to be right..but guess what...i just proved how dumb you look..so just stop
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Oct 4, 2007 11:57:14 GMT -5
2 year olds don't do as much research as I do. You may not be able to handle that, but you didn't prove anything. Especially since you have no idea what you're talking about. You twisted because you knew I was right about much of what I was saying. You twisted because you needed a slanted angle by which your half-assed logic could be applied.
But you completely lost sight of what this was all about. And you did that because you wanted to make me look bad. You didn't prove anything. And you were the one who made things up and twisted things around. Proof: "you worship"... I never said I worshipped anyone. You however wanted to make me look bad, so you made stuff up. I'm just using the figures to say, if that's the way you want it then that's the way it's going to be.
I think you need to understand that, but I'll leave you to deal with it any way you can.
Just remember, you started this whole thing. You wanted to use reviews or ratings or "Majority Rules" when they were against Squirm, but then you couldn't handle it when they were against Pro-Life. Remember that. You're the one who worships. Because how many times did you and your buddy say MST3K were right about Squirm? Who is the worshipper here? And I was the first one to identify who the Poser was. Now you think you can take that away and use it for your own purposes? Get your own damn phrases, you copycat!
But "stop it"?? It's already over. It was over before it began. You do know that, don't you?
|
|
shunty
SERIAL KILLER
????#???? ?
Posts: 537
|
Post by shunty on Apr 7, 2008 20:03:17 GMT -5
now that i'm done scrolling past all of your bitching, i'd like to give my thoughts on this show. I loved it! Best anthology show ever, with Twilight Zone (59') and Darkside right behind.
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Apr 8, 2008 10:02:31 GMT -5
Yes, the 1st season did have some AMAZING stuff in it.
There's a third season coming up. But it's going to be COMPLETELY different. It's going to NBC, they're calling it "Fear Itself," most of the directors are not coming back, and the films/episodes will now be only 45 minutes a piece instead of 57 minutes.
|
|
shunty
SERIAL KILLER
????#???? ?
Posts: 537
|
Post by shunty on Apr 8, 2008 10:25:08 GMT -5
I've been hearing bout that. So what do you think: recipe for suckage or possible good network fright show (which there hasn't been for a looong time)?
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Apr 8, 2008 10:33:55 GMT -5
Well... That's a good question. I don't think horror movies "have" to be R-rated. Goodness knows the 1980's was an amazing decade for PG and PG-13 horror (Killer Klowns from Outer Space, Gremlins, Night of the Comet, Critters 1 & 2, Ghoulies 2, The Monster Squad, and several others). I think "STYLE" is what this decade is sorely missing. And someone not afraid to do something that distances their films from all the crap the studios are releasing.
The only plus I can think of (well, there are 2, actually) is that we won't have to pay to see the episodes. They'll all be free. I know a lot of people don't have Showtime. As far as the slate of directors goes - Stuart Gordon and John Landis are definitely coming back, John Carpenter was first rumored to be returning now he's not confirmed, and Mary Harron (American Psycho) will be joining. So I'll definitely be checking her episode / film out.
There are still something like 6 directors who haven't been confirmed for the line-up. As far as my last news update read is concerned. I'm interested to see if among those names will be William Malone. Yeah his movies all stunk, but his Masters of Horror - The Fair Haried Child - is the second best out of the whole series. Or if anyone else will be returning.
|
|
shunty
SERIAL KILLER
????#???? ?
Posts: 537
|
Post by shunty on Apr 8, 2008 18:48:51 GMT -5
I hope the censors let em get away with more because its a horror show and the year is 2008. I mean c'mon! Just c'mon! Anyway, shows like Tales from the Darkside and Monsters could get away with things that weren't kid friendly a lot of the time (especially Darkside) so I still do have hope. But it won't be Masters. That's for sure. There won't be any Imprints or Cigarette Burns or Jenifers or Right to Dies or etc.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Apr 8, 2008 21:44:51 GMT -5
i dont like the idea of it being on NBC sure a movie can be good without gore as i have seen alot that are.. and yea there are good PG-13 movies but like you said laz they are all from the 80's.. anything with a pg-13 rating on it to is terrible.. mostly some crappy remake..i would have liked to see it go to scifi as they seem to be able to get away with alot..they barely ever cut movies on there.. but i will still give it a chance and watch the episodes
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Apr 9, 2008 18:51:31 GMT -5
I think of MOH as "movies" so, if you throw commercials into that....BAAAH!
I still say that Season 2 sunk the ship. It upped the gore and nudity but lacked the magic of Season 1.(I still have to see The Washingtonians, Dream Cruise, and Sounds Like but am sure they won't change my opinion).
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Apr 10, 2008 5:41:49 GMT -5
I saw some video clips of Sounds Like and it Looks-Like a fucking horrible episode.
T, I have little faith in this overall formula too. I just want to think that the quality of the Directors can turn it around.
Another thing I forgot to mention is that The Writers for this new season are going to be a little different. A lot of the writers that have been hired are writers for TV. That's the thing (and the commercials, of course) that worries me the most. And the casts - same exact thing. They're casting mostly people from shows like Heroes and NCIS or whatever.
Oh, yet another thing, I'm told that the NAME CHANGE of the show was so that any of the directors can make an Action episode if they want to. I knew Ronny Yu was a bad choice for a director - since Freddy Vs. Jason sucked so badly. I read about the episode he's doing and it's exactly like that movie Face Off. Which was not even remotely close to being a horror movie.
My personal philosophy about horror and about Masters of Horror is that these guys need 2 things: Creative Freedom, and a little time. If this new deal, regardless of how bad it looks online / on-paper, can give them the freedom to film what they want (especially in terms of plot and character) yet also give them a little more time to shoot it than Masters of Horror did, we might end up with something better than the second season of MoH. Something a lot less rushed.
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Apr 10, 2008 20:32:04 GMT -5
From what I read, MOH season 1 was....refreshing.All shot in Vancouver with only two American actors allowed per episode. By Season 2, the actor's part (2) got blown to shit from what I've seen. I want gore, I want nudity, and I want swearing, none of which will be on this show so I am now officially bummed and would not fart in its direction.
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Apr 12, 2008 15:28:39 GMT -5
I like gore but the quality of gore FX this decade hasn't exactly set any standard. So, I'd take whatever I can get. Have you noticed - this decade's blood always looks like red-tinted honey / maple-syrup / tree sap?? It always has a crystalline, transparent quality to it. I want my blood to be solid red.
The Nudity expectation is pretty childish. And for Masters of Horror, none of the directors have really used it to an effect that's added anything to the series or the genre. Still, perhaps the 3 best usages of nudity in horror will always be: Return of the Living Dead, Nightmare on Elm Street 3, and The Howling.
Swearing? You fucking call that a plus? What the fuck? Are you out of your fucking mind? Fuck you.
Don't you think incessant swearing is annoying?
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Apr 14, 2008 15:20:27 GMT -5
I noticed that a lot of movies don't do dried blood properly.The blood is still bright red even when it dries?! We want crusty,brown blood!
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Apr 14, 2008 15:26:04 GMT -5
Profanity-laden dialogue is pretty cheap but the odd f-word thrown in adds a bit of realism.
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Apr 14, 2008 16:27:36 GMT -5
Good - I can agree on that. But movies like The Blair Witch Project and The Devil's Rejects have nothing but F words in their dialogue.
|
|