|
Post by malbowski13 on Sept 20, 2008 16:37:24 GMT -5
I hope this prick finally gets some jail time. Who's with me on this?
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 21, 2008 0:05:02 GMT -5
i would imagine everyone but laz the only person alive who actually thinks he didnt kill his wife but ya i would love to see him rot in jail for along time
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 21, 2008 12:26:01 GMT -5
i would imagine everyone but laz the only person alive who actually thinks he didnt kill his wife Liar liar, T. I never said he didn't do it. You and Dumbass-Dave just said I did. But you're both stupid liars, because you two think you're so fucking funny. Try: idiots. Then you'd be right. If he gets jail-time, it will be for this gun violation, threatening to beat up people at that apartment or whatever happened that year, 2007?
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 23, 2008 19:13:29 GMT -5
so you do think he killed is wife then??
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 25, 2008 4:42:53 GMT -5
Didn't say that either, did I. What I said is - you weren't there. And that's a fact. You were, what, 10 years old... I doubt you were there. So you didn't see it happen. So, therefore, you don't know he did anything for a fact. You can only think.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 25, 2008 5:29:42 GMT -5
well by that logic you must not know anything then, or me or any1 else, if we have to be there to actually know it, hell i wasnt there when dario argento directed opera so how do i know he really did it. maybe some1 else did and he just took credit, see that just dumb logic you are using, as for oj every single piece of evidence pointed to him and they never found any1 else, its pretty obvious to 99% of the world
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 25, 2008 11:55:31 GMT -5
BE CAREFUL, T, you're now entering territory completely virgin to you - you should only use words you know the meaning of. "Logic" is a bit big for you... Spell it out, first. Then, sound it out. Then, think about it. Re-think it. Then, you may proceed. if we have to be there to actually know it There you go again, T. You turn everything into a competition because you're so desperate for any occasion when you can be "right" about something (in your own head, of course). So you twist my words around and hope you can dispose of the meaning. Nice try, T. But the point is - WHEN YOU MAKE AN ACCUSATION AGAINST SOMEONE ELSE, you need proof. That's my point. If you didn't pick up on that - and it wasn't subtle, either, T - maybe you're not as smart as you think you are. You weren't there, so to believe he did it as an absolute fact, you have to trust the media. And no one trusts the media, T. Because that's foolish. They used to say people could get AIDS just by kissing someone infected. Do you believe that too? see that just dumb logic you are using Again T, just like with "respect," you truly don't grasp the concept of Logic. Maybe you shouldn't try to understand things that hurt your widduw head. as for oj every single piece of evidence pointed to him and they never found any1 else, its pretty obvious to 99% of the world Okay, so NOW you're letting the majority make up your mind for you? I thought that was against what you've been preaching here about hating the mainstream and only liking what you term as "low budget" horror. You say you don't let people make up your mind for you and that I, in fact, do. I guess you were holding your own card when thinking you were reading mine. And I don't think you know anything about the evidence. I don't believe you even followed the case. You're a racist, anyway. You've proven that beyond the shadow of a reasonable doubt. So who says you're not inclined to believe the worst, just based on fart and gossip? Another thing - you don't like people assuming things about you, do you? You sure do a lot of assuming for other people. You must not believe in the age-old creed : treat others the way you would want to be treated.
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Sept 25, 2008 18:13:34 GMT -5
All the defense did was take the focus off of O.J. and turned it on Mark Furman. Without that bullshit, O.J. would have been toast. Literally.
If O.J. didn't do it, I would chop off my left nut with a table spoon.The man is a confirmed sociopath and deserves punishment.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 26, 2008 1:22:08 GMT -5
blahhhh its so obvious he did it and everyone knows it, not worth arguing with a moron about
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 26, 2008 9:12:43 GMT -5
blahhhh its so obvious he did it and everyone knows it, not worth arguing with a moron about Who's arguing with you? I don't see anyone. When anyone engages in something with you, you're always the moron by default. All the defense did was take the focus off of O.J. and turned it on Mark Furman. Without that bullshit, O.J. would have been toast. Literally. If O.J. didn't do it, I would chop off my left nut with a table spoon. The man is a confirmed sociopath and deserves punishment. Well, most sociopaths have more contact with their victims and have more of an interfering force in their victims' lives than O.J. had with Nicole. You know- they get off on putting pressure on their victims. Like threatening them and scaring them and making them feel like they have nowhere to turn. That's not the way things were with O.J. and Nicole when she was murdered. So, psychologically-speaking, the "sociopath" argument makes no sense. The whole thing about he couldn't take her rejection, so he killed her because of his ego... doesn't make sense. Think about it. He was a freakin' rich, fit, American football player. He could get laid like-that. And as for prior violent behavior, sports is to blame for that. Sports makes people do terrible things every minute of every day. Somewhere in the world, every minute of every day - someone is killing someone else, or trying to kill someone else, or trying to make someone kill themselves - because of the psycho drive of the sports industry. And maybe sports are what made the killer kill her and that guy - IF the killer isn't O.J. Which it might be since there's still no sound reason for him to have killed her. It still needs to be said because it's not sinking in with any of you here - the trial DESTROYED his career. Why the hell would he do that to himself? He's not the kind of guy who would be cool with being labeled a victim. Nor does he want to be thought of as a killer. WHY would he have killed his wife, knowing what he would become: the laughing stock of professional sports. There have been more O.J. jokes than jokes at any single other person in the entire industry. Why the fuck would he do that to himself? IT MAKES NO SENSE.
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Oct 5, 2008 16:11:30 GMT -5
Found guilty of all 12 charges. Hope he tosses some salad soon.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Oct 5, 2008 23:20:02 GMT -5
GREAT NEWS
|
|