|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Jan 30, 2008 22:08:27 GMT -5
I hope ,at the least, that this guy is the front-runner for the Democrats.
It seems like stuff is reversed this time around. Not that it matters but... the Republicans have all the mutants running. Any thoughts?
P.S. Hilary Clinton sux!
|
|
piggsy
SERIAL KILLER
????#???? ?$ ?
Posts: 1,044
|
Post by piggsy on Jan 30, 2008 22:10:00 GMT -5
Congratulations on becoming a Serial Killer! ;D
Hilary Clinton does suck
|
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Jan 30, 2008 22:14:57 GMT -5
Congrats back Piggsy! The woman makes me barf.
|
|
lowkey
SERIAL KILLER
Posts: 574
|
Post by lowkey on Jan 30, 2008 22:24:04 GMT -5
I don't like Hillary either. If it comes down to her and McCain, I'd vote for McCain. Actually I don't really believe in voting anyway, but I think Obama might be the rare candidate truly worth voting for.
|
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Jan 30, 2008 22:29:55 GMT -5
i really dont give a shit about any of them or voting, it really means nothing to me and i have no interest in it at all
|
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Jan 31, 2008 6:57:01 GMT -5
All politicians operate on a system of rules insanely-foreign to all other Americans. It isn't humanly possible for an intelligent person to ever actually trust a politician. If you understand the game of politics even in the most blunt way.
To me, it's all about which side is less corrupt. Which is why I'll never vote for a Republican in my life.
|
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Jan 31, 2008 21:01:23 GMT -5
I believe that your party system does suck.It's like you get two choices and the third is usually a vote-spoiler. Here is a little bit different. You vote on the party rather than the individual. If Quebec wants to separate so bad, why do they have a person running for PM? Let those turds float away already, I say. I am French myself but the French and Natives cause all the shit up here.
|
|
shunty
SERIAL KILLER
????#???? ?
Posts: 537
|
Post by shunty on Apr 24, 2008 17:58:42 GMT -5
Did anybody hear the newest insane Hilary remark? The one about OBLITERATING Iran?
|
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Apr 24, 2008 19:14:32 GMT -5
^^ sounds good to me  |
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Apr 24, 2008 20:13:07 GMT -5
Fuckin 'eh!They have the tools to end this crap, but the people won't let them. Not to sound like a tyrant but... the way it's going now,there is no end in sight. And NO, pulling out is not an option.If they pull out, they might as well kill all the military and police(Iranian) as well as their families. This whole situation sucks and whatever happens, someone or some people will be hurt to the highest degree. A damn shame. That's why I will always have support for our(and your)brave troops trying to do their best in this madness.
|
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Apr 24, 2008 21:12:26 GMT -5
fuck other countries and fuck our troops...KILLEM ALLLLLLLLL
|
|
shunty
SERIAL KILLER
????#???? ?
Posts: 537
|
Post by shunty on Apr 25, 2008 6:35:18 GMT -5
The last days of Rome, people.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Apr 26, 2008 9:51:26 GMT -5
Fuckin 'eh!They have the tools to end this crap, but the people won't let them. Not to sound like a tyrant but... the way it's going now,there is no end in sight. And NO, pulling out is not an option.If they pull out, they might as well kill all the military and police(Iranian) as well as their families. This whole situation sucks and whatever happens, someone or some people will be hurt to the highest degree. A damn shame. That's why I will always have support for our(and your)brave troops trying to do their best in this madness. Well some people care more about the numbers of our own casualties over the casualties of the people in Iraq. We should never have gone their in the first place. That is obvious. But do you think people have finally agreed on "the" reason why we went there yet? Oil, or, to build Churches and Schools? Which is it? |
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Apr 28, 2008 12:47:28 GMT -5
So what if it is oil? All through recorded history, there have been invasions,takeovers,conquerers,etc. It's human nature, right or wrong.
|
|
lowkey
SERIAL KILLER
Posts: 574
|
Post by lowkey on Apr 28, 2008 17:35:25 GMT -5
True Mal, but the difference is that the Danes were honest about why they were invading England. The Huns never once felt the need to claim they were merely trying to give the Romans freedom. The Mongols didn't give a flying fuck if they offended Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, etc, or not.
Well the other difference is that the nobodies among the Danes, Huns, and Mongols got a piece of the spoils they helped obtain. Today our soldier's families are having to go on welfare, while people who never set foot in a combat zone rake in all the profits.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Apr 30, 2008 3:06:14 GMT -5
Excellent point, Lowkey. I'm no professor, but I think you just won your argument.
|
|
|
|
Post by malbowski13 on Apr 30, 2008 17:59:43 GMT -5
Touche Lowkey!
|
|
