|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 19, 2007 3:22:37 GMT -5
Let those 'Sex & the City' bimbos have it!  - (spoken by all at once) "We're overblown character portrayals of exaggerated female stereotypes! HOORAY!" |
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 19, 2007 3:27:28 GMT -5
ok everyone now make your best im taking it up the ass face
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 19, 2007 3:29:39 GMT -5
^^^ LMAO! #1 looks like it really hurts, #2 looks like it tickles, #3 looks like it won't quite fit, and #4 looks like, well, she enjoys it!
|
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 19, 2007 3:36:05 GMT -5
^^^ haha yea you nailed each face right on the head
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 19, 2007 3:37:18 GMT -5
^^^ haha yea you nailed each face right on the head Lol, maybe after the dude pulls out he can "nail each face right on the head" too? |
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 5:42:46 GMT -5
Wait a second - where's Cynthia Nixon? She's got short hair.
Anyway - if you guys had put up a picture of Desperate Housewives..., then I could cook. But this, I got nothing for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 22, 2007 5:58:30 GMT -5
^^^ Ooo, excellent idea. I'll have to remember that one down the road.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 6:38:41 GMT -5
I think there's just something to be said for a show that appeals directly to the audience it was intended for. I don't say anything about The Dick Van Dyke show, George Burns & Gracie Allen, Mary Tyler Moore, Barney Miller, Good Times... I have nothing bad to say about this show. Yeah, it was stretched thin by the end and got ridiculous some times. But how the hell would a straight male know why this show was fundamentally bad??
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 22, 2007 6:43:44 GMT -5
But how the hell would a straight male know why this show was fundamentally bad?? That's literally one of the most stupid, close-minded things I've ever heard anyone say. Ever. |
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 7:01:24 GMT -5
So you say, but can you prove it was wrong?
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 22, 2007 7:18:28 GMT -5
Yes, I most definitely could. But giving that comment an answer would validate it as an intelligent thing to say, and it most definitely wasn't. Therefore, the answer I previously gave was the only response that it deserved to, or will ever get from me.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 7:26:28 GMT -5
Like I said before, and you never commented on... "There's just something to be said for a show that appeals directly to the audience it's intended for." We'll just leave it at that, if you actually think I'm closed minded.
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 22, 2007 7:42:44 GMT -5
It appeals to vapid, vain, moronic people. What's to be applauded for about that? Most intelligent females I know not only dislike it, but are offended as well. Much the same way that I, as a male, am offended by shows like The King of Queens and Everybody Loves Raymond.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 7:45:10 GMT -5
I like Sex and the City but am not vapid or moronic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 22, 2007 7:57:23 GMT -5
I would argue that that's debatable at times.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 7:59:30 GMT -5
Who cares what you would argue - you look at pictures of people doing one thing and say that makes them something else! You would make-up any story so it would give you something to make a cheap joke about. What ISN'T debatable about that?
|
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 22, 2007 18:08:33 GMT -5
^^its called having fun..you just take it way way way to serious
|
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 22, 2007 19:20:55 GMT -5
I'll admit to that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 23, 2007 2:37:22 GMT -5
Good to hear.
|
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 23, 2007 6:24:22 GMT -5
"I suppose you realize that now I have to reconsider my position."
|
|
