|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 18, 2007 18:39:25 GMT -5
Why are you guys so itching to accept something that hasn't been proven? How does that benefit you? Does it get you off or something to go after a celebrity just because they're rich or a black man because he's big - is this about a feeling of inferiority inside you both somewhere?
no it doesnt get me off going after a celebrity because they are rich or black...im a football and a basketball fan...i like many rich black men and root for them..its because OJ is a pathetic human being..a pathetic piece of sh*t that should be dead right now..he murdered his wife...the mother of his children..and now hes got himself into more trouble...99% of the people that live in the U.S. know hes a murderer and want to see him dead or in jail too.
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 18, 2007 19:23:28 GMT -5
OJ is a piece of sh*t that should be dead right now.. That's not for you to decide. If there is a God, that is his, her, their, or It's job. If there is not, it's nobody's job. Nature will do what it wills with all of us. Why do you want to decide when other people should be dead? Do you want someone else deciding when You should be dead? he murdered his wife...the mother of his children.. You do not know that as a fact. 99% of the people that live in the U.S. know hes a murderer Bulls hit. 99% of the people who live in the U.S. did not see the murder take place or who killed those two people.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 18, 2007 19:59:59 GMT -5
hes a murderer so we all should decide when he dies and that should be right now...i do know that 100%...and like i have told you before i dont have to see it to know its true..it was so obvious even a retarted deaf, blind man would know hes guilty...all the evidence pointed at him and they never found any1 else..stop acting like you dont know he did it..defending that piece of sh*t is almost as bad as being him
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 18, 2007 20:52:55 GMT -5
You don't know that - you did not see it happen. we all should decide when he dies and that should be right now... Not unless we're God or he says he wants us to decide that. We can't decide for the victims because - they're dead. And we can't decide for ourselves until we give someone else the right to decided when we die. You haven't proved that you know very much 100% - you keep saying you know things you didn't witness. Therefore, you only think, you don't know. like i have told you before i dont have to see it to know its true.. What makes you think that? Who told you that? it was so obvious even a retarted deaf, blind man would know hes guilty... Bull shit. If it was so obvious to even a retarded, deaf, blind man... than O.J. would be in jail. all the evidence pointed at him and they never found any1 else.. You don't know what the evidence really was because you didn't collect it with the police, you didn't discuss it with the police - you only saw what the media told you you could see. The media manipulates everything and doesn't see facts for themselves. Therefore, you don't know about the evidence - you only know what the media told you. Why do you pretend you're a cop, a lawyer, and a judge? You're not, you know... stop acting like you dont know he did it.. What makes you think I'm acting? At least I'm smart enough to know that to Know Something: You Have to See it For Yourself. I didn't see him kill anyone, therefore I don't pretend to know anything. Unlike you, who is pretending to know O.J. killed people. But - why do you pretend that you know? What do you have to gain from it? What does this do for you? defending that piece of sh*t is almost as bad as being him I've told you a million times - I am not defending him. I'm accusing you of being a big, fat liar. And you know why - because you don't know SOMEONE ELSE'S life unless you live it or witness what they do - with your own eyes.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 18, 2007 22:14:21 GMT -5
^^ why do you always have to try and be right...you keep bringing up these pointless stupid things..oj should be lynched and die like the the piece of sh*t he is...they let him get away with murder because of his celebrity status..open up your eyes..hes guilty..and you are defending him by even thinming there is a way he can be innocent..you must have been in another country when the whole trial was going on..because any person with eve na speck of common sense knows hes guilty..no questions asked..
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 18, 2007 22:20:04 GMT -5
one more thing to add is im sure you know laz they always catxh the killer..about 99% of the time...so do you think its just a coincidence that ALL the evidence pointed to OJ...and they never found any1 else..im sure some random guy said hell im gonna go kill oj simpsons wife..and he got away clean???..its so obvious that he murdered her and got away with it because of his celebrity status..because before he did it everyone thought he was such a good guy...i dont think you are a complete idiot so stop acting like one
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 19, 2007 2:59:26 GMT -5
I did answer the questions directly, remember? His motive was "control." And you're wrong about them getting along just grand. They're were multiple witnesses that claim that OJ was anything but ok with Nicole being involved with Goldman or any of the other men in her life. He physically abused her several times when they were still married because he "suspected" she was cheating on him. There's 911 tapes to prove that. He constantly called her and followed her around town after SHE left him. In other words he never wanted to let her go. It's an ego thing. The guy was beloved by everyone else in the world EXCEPT the woman he wanted. In his mind, it didn't make any sense why she'd want to be with anybody but him, because he thought so highly of himself. All these types of characteristics fit perfectly with what adds up to being a control freak and an ego maniac. It simply got to the point where if he couldn't have her, nobody could. Besides, if he didn't do it then how do you explain the bloody gloves, the bloody footprints that match his shoes, BOTH victims' blood in HIS vehicle, the packed suitcases in his home, the airplane tickets, the suicide note, and the escape attempt from the police? And don't come back with that lame LAPD conspiracy theory b.s. Fuhrman was a racist jackass, but to believe in a conspiracy of that ridiculously grand magnitude is absolutely ludicas. If this case proved anything, it was only that MONEY really can buy you freedom. Come on Laz, you're too smart a guy to really believe there's any reasonable doubt that the prick was innocent. Besides, the case of his guilt has been proven to me. I don't think anyone has to be there to know it happened. If that's the case, than why operate the justice system on the theory of "reasonable doubt?" Should jury trials only be allowed to be held if the jurors were all there and witnessed the crime being committed? Put it this way: I gather that you believe the Bush administration falsified and manipulated CIA intelligence to sell the Iraq war, right? Well, you weren't there to see them do it, were you? But you know it happened because you're a reasonably intelligent human being who is able piece together pieces of information and evidence that, when added together, allows you to assess guilt of the crime. Even though you were NEVER there. I mean come on, this is just plain silly now.
|
|
|
Post by lazario on Sept 19, 2007 16:03:51 GMT -5
TSmooth - your portion of this conversation is over. You think Squirm and Texas Chainsaw Massacre '74 suck. And you also consider that ponyboy Mark Wahlberg to be a respectable actor. HA! I laugh in the face of... danger? Or just you. HA! HA!
Dave - you still don't understand why I'm in this thing right now, do you? I can't believe he is guilty until I hear a really good motive. You (and your Cronie, TSmooth) can't just say... "well...uh...um... But all the evidence points to him." All the evidence? Except for a motive. Ego is not enough. Unless he was an honest to God insane psychopath to begin with, he needed an honest to God reason to kill her. Why did he wait all that time? Why then, at that time? Why would he fuck up his whole life - just because his ego was stronger than common sense? Not if he waited all that time to plan, plot, and execute this crime!
People keep ignoring that HUGE, glaring omission from their Perfect, Gift-Wrapped Explanation of what happened. Well, I cannot. If I did, I would be the hugest hypocrite in the entire world.
And you can't compare this to the Bush Administration crimes - we all know why they did it. For MONEY and because it doesn't matter what people think of them, whoever has the money controls the way Most people think. They don't have to worry about anything. But O.J. can never live a normal life because of his being put on trial the way he was. Why do you assume he was ready to do that to himself? Just because of his Ego?
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 19, 2007 23:07:07 GMT -5
TSmooth - your portion of this conversation is over. You think Squirm and Texas Chainsaw Massacre '74 suck. And you also consider that ponyboy Mark Wahlberg to be a respectable actor. HA! I laugh in the face of... danger? Or just you. HA! HA!your portion of the conversation is over because you like TCM and squirm...and you think wahlberg is on the level of girlyboy ashton kutcher..see what i did there? you cant bring up some totally diff subject and bring it into here..just admit you were wrong and stop making yourself look like a bigger moron with each post you do in this topic..OJ is guilty and we all know it..you say you dont like football but you must be a bills fan...that and the biggest OJ fanboy to ever walk this earth
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 20, 2007 2:13:38 GMT -5
Alright, I'm done. If anyone wants to continue this "debate" you can look me up in the land of REALITY.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 20, 2007 17:28:54 GMT -5
michael vick
terrell owens
both need to be added to this list
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 21, 2007 2:37:45 GMT -5
^^ Agreed. Might as well throw Pac Man Jones on the pile too.
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 21, 2007 3:44:35 GMT -5
haha pac man is just a sad case..how many chances can the guy get??? hes just a very dumb person
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 21, 2007 3:48:30 GMT -5
Yeah thugs are thugs. Only thing that makes Pac Man different from the rest of his criminal entourage is that he can run fast. Pretty sad if you think about it. The guy's athletic abilities gave him all the opportunities in the world to leave that lifestyle behind, but apparently he never figured it out. Probably spent all that rookie money up by now I'm sure, so he'll end up another petty poor criminal sitting on a street corner like the rest of the clowns from his "neighborhood."
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 21, 2007 3:52:34 GMT -5
yep almsot like maurice clarret..not sure if i spelled his name right but you know who i mean right?..only diff is maurice prob wasnt gonna make a team anyway..pacman was a pro bowl return man so he had a job and was set to make millions..you cant get much dumber then that..
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 21, 2007 3:56:53 GMT -5
Lol, Clarrett is already in jail; Pac Man is headed there eventually. Maybe they can be cellmates and spend their remaining days chatting about how bad they both BLEW IT!
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 21, 2007 4:04:11 GMT -5
why not just throw vick and OJ in there too..
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 21, 2007 4:12:02 GMT -5
Lol, and Mike Tyson too?
|
|
|
Post by tsmooth31 on Sept 21, 2007 4:18:30 GMT -5
hell why not..i say stick them all in and only let 1 survive...last man standing wins
|
|
|
Post by Evil Dave on Sept 21, 2007 4:21:08 GMT -5
Mike Tyson would just eat them all. lol ;D
|
|